Selection Bias in College Admissions Test Scores
نویسندگان
چکیده
Data from college admissions tests can provide a valuable measure of student achievement, but the non-representativeness of test-takers is an important concern. We examine selectivity bias in both state-level and school-level SAT and ACT averages. The degree of selectivity may differ importantly across and within schools, and across and within states. To identify within-state selectivity, we use a control function approach that conditions on scores from a representative test. Estimates indicate strong selectivity of test-takers in “ACT states,” where most collegebound students take the ACT, and much less selectivity in SAT states. To identify withinand between-school selectivity, we take advantage of a policy reform in Illinois that made taking the ACT a graduation requirement. Estimates based on this policy change indicate substantial positive selection into test participation both across and within schools. Despite this, schoollevel averages of observed scores are extremely highly correlated with average latent scores, as across-school variation in sample selectivity is small relative to the underlying signal. As a result, in most contexts the use of observed school mean test scores in place of latent means understates the degree of between-school variation in achievement but is otherwise unlikely to lead to misleading conclusions. * Corresponding author. Harris School of Public Policy Studies; 1155 E. 60 Street; Chicago, IL 60637. Tel: (773) 834-0207. Fax: (773) 702-0926. E-mail: [email protected]. We thank DeForest McDuff for excellent research assistance and Jeff Smith for helpful comments.
منابع مشابه
Treatment evaluation in the presence of sample selection
Sample selection is inherent to a range of treatment evaluation problems as the estimation of the returns to schooling or of the effect of school vouchers on test scores of college admissions tests, when some students abstain from the test in a non-random manner. Parametric and semiparametric estimators tackling selectivity typically rely on restrictive functional form assumptions that are unli...
متن کاملDoes high school quality matter? Evidence from admissions data
This paper examines the effect of attending elite private high school on college placement using admissions data from the most selective high school in a large metropolitan area. To overcome omitted variable bias, we limit the sample to admitted applicants and control directly for the scores assigned by admissions based on in-depth analyses of the applicants
متن کاملMaking SAT Scores Optional in Selective College Admissions: A Case Study
Despite heightened scrutiny of the use of standardized tests in college admissions, there has been little public empirical analysis of the effects of an optional SAT score submission policy on college admissions. This paper examines the results of the decision by Mount Holyoke College to make SAT scores optional in the admissions process. We find that students who “under-performed” on the SAT r...
متن کاملStudent effort, race gaps, and affirmative action in college admissions: theory and empirics
In this dissertation, I develop a framework to investigate the implications of Affirmative Action in college admissions on both study effort choice and college placement outcomes for high school students. I model the college admissions process as a Bayesian game where heterogeneous students compete for seats at colleges and universities of varying prestige. There is an allocation mechanism whic...
متن کاملAnalysis of Stable Matchings in R: Package matchingMarkets
R package matchingMarkets implements structural estimators to correct for the sample selection bias from observed outcomes in matching markets. This includes one-sided matching of agents into groups as well as two-sided matching of students to schools. The package also contains algorithms to find stable matchings in the three most common matching problems: the stable roommates problem, the coll...
متن کامل